Carnival of Space #105


This week's carnival has several surprises, not the least of which is the switch in authors of Space Disco, which up until recently was Dave Mosher's gig. Now my friend Ian O'Neill from Astroengine.com has taken on the writing duties for Discovery Space. Whoa, time warp!

There are some really good entries in this weeks space fair, so head over right now. Click here to be transported to the 105th Carnival of Space!

The Frozen Dome

Normally, if I heard or read the words 'Dome C' I would think they referred to the third dome in a cluster of structures at some observatory. Recently, I've come to learn that Dome C is also the name for one of the coldest places on earth, one of several summits on the Antarctic Ice Shelf.

Ironically, there is still an astronomical link. Dome C is considered to be one of the best potential sites for a new observatory on the face of our planet. For one thing, the Sun never gets higher than 38 degrees above the horizon, so there is a lot of night time for observing from the south polar region. Even better, there is almost no infrared sky glow, the air is extremely dry, there is almost no aerosol or dust, and no light pollution. The Antarctic Plateau is the largest desert on Earth, so there is very little precipitation and a very high percentage of cloud-free time. Surprisingly, the wind is also quite mild at Dome C, averaging a mere 6 mph in winter. That is a good thing, considering the average annual temperature is -55C, with lows of -80C and balmy highs in the -25C range. Who needs wind chill when it's that cold?

Most importantly, the seeing is typically 2.5 times better at Dome C than at the best existing observatories. Star images taken through a telescope at Dome C would be 2.5 times sharper and 6 times brighter.


The image on the left is a simulation of a star field as observed from the best existing observatory sites; the image in the middle is the same star field as observed from Dome C. To see as many stars from a mid-latitude observatory, you would need to build a telescope 2.5 times bigger, which would cost ten times as much, and would give the image on the right, which makes the stars look brighter but doesn't improve the sharpness of the image.

Image and text from 'Exceptional astronomical seeing conditions above Dome C in Antarctica', by
by Jon S. Lawrence, Michael C. B. Ashley, Andrei Tokovinin, and Tony Travouillon, published in Nature, 16 September 2004.

Three interesting papers have been released to the pre-print server arXiv.org describing the PILOT program (the Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope), a proposed observatory on Dome C in Antarctica. The first paper presents an overview of the instrumentation suite and its expected performance, a summary of the key science goals and a discussion of the future of Antarctic astronomy.

Paper 2 describes a series of projects dealing with the distant Universe. One potential project that caught my eye is the search for pair-instability supernovae (PISNe) and gamma-ray burst afterglows. These could be our best glimpses into stars formed in the very early days of the Universe. PISNe are predicted to be the product of super massive stars formed in the early history of the Universe. These stars were formed before there were any heavier elements, so their unique chemical composition and masses resulted in a different kind of final disruption of the supernovae progenitors in this era. The light curves of these PISNe are predicted to be have slower rise times and to stay bright for much longer than SN closer to home. This is pretty cutting edge astrophysics, seeing as how no PISN has ever been found.

PILOT could also examine some of the first evolved galaxies and galaxy clusters to inform us of the processes in the evolution of structure in the Universe. They also propose a large-area weak-lensing survey and a program to obtain supernovae infrared light-curves to examine the nature and evolution of dark energy and dark matter.

The ability to do infra-red astronomy from the planet's surface makes PILOT a good match and essentially the only competition for the James Webb Space Telescope in the coming decade.

Paper 3 presents a series of projects dealing with the nearby Universe. Several projects are proposed that examine stellar populations in nearby galaxies and stellar clusters, to gain insight into the formation and evolution of younger galaxies and stars.

Other projects will investigate the formation processes of stellar and planetary systems. Three projects in the field of exoplanet science are proposed. These include a search for free-floating low-mass planets and dwarfs, a program of follow-up observations of gravitational microlensing events, and a study of infrared light-curves for previously discovered exoplanets.

Free-floating low-mass planets; now there is a category of interesting objects. The plan is to examine nearby star clusters to search for planets not associated with stars down to several Jupiter masses. Why would astronomers be so interested in free floating planets? Because typically, exoplanets light is difficult or impossible to disentangle from the light of their accompanying star. If we can find exoplanets free of the overpowering glare of their host stars we can study the chemical composition and atmospheric properties of these planets.

And finally a study of coronal mass ejections from the Sun, and a monitoring program searching for small-scale Low Earth Orbit satellite debris items are also proposed.

The opportunities to do exciting, results-oriented science exploration and discovery from Antarctica is is almost as mind-numbing as the night time temperatures resident astronomers and technicians will have to bear to perform the work.

Constructing, operating and maintaining a telescope at the bottom of the world under these conditions will be another great story. Now that I know about Dome C and PILOT, I'll keep an ear to the ground and let you know when there are new developments.

Double Quasar!

An IAU Circular landed in my email box today with a strange headline I found hard to ignore.

'DOUBLE QUASAR SDSS J153636.22+044127.0'

A double quasar? Wow, that has got to be rare. Is it the first one ever found? How did they determine its dual nature? If it already has a Sloan licence plate name, why are they just announcing this now?

I was hooked. I had to research this thing and get the whole story.

First of all, what are quasars? Where did the word come from and what does it mean?

Quasar is a sort of abbreviation for "quasi-stellar radio source". Its also common to refer to them as QSO's (quasi stellar objects). These are active galaxies at least 3 billion light years distant, some a lot further away. They have massive black holes in their centers that cause them to emit radiation in many wavelengths, including radio. Some have jets emanating from the core, perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy. They look like points of light because they are so far away. But make no mistake, these are mysterious galaxies from the early history of the universe.

Image credit: NASA Education and Public Outreach at Sonoma State University - Aurore Simonnet

Many quasars are variable, so I've been aware of them as observing targets for a long time. In fact, several were given names in the General Catalog of Variable Stars because they were mistakenly categorized as variable stars. BL Lac and W Com come to mind immediately.

Now what about that crazy alphanumeric name? SDSS J153636.22+044127.0

Named objects beginning with 'SDSS' are objects discovered by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The numbers correspond to their positions in Right Ascension and Declination on the sky. The Sloan survey has discovered most of the over 200,000 known quasars.

The spectrum of this radio-quiet QSO exhibits two broad emission-line systems at slightly different redshifts in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey optical spectrum, so it was originally thought that this might be a black hole binary QSO. The separation between the two sources is less than an arc second, so very high precision images needed to be taken to distinguish the pair and determine their distance from one another.

Subsequently, measurements taken with the Very Large Array, imaging in the radio regime at 8.5 GHz, revealed two sources, separated by a mere 0.97 arcseconds. The individual sources were too small to resolve. In a paper by J. M. Wrobel and A. Laor (http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/0905.3566) it was suggested that these two sources might actually be two quasars separated by approximately 5 parsecs, instead of a binary black hole quasar. Images and measurements with more precision would be needed to make the call.

Today the call came in. A multi-national team of astronomers report on a deep K-band image taken at the European Southern Observatory using the VLT and an instrument called HAWK-1. The image shows that the object is composed of two sources at a separation of 1". Both sources consist of a nucleus plus an extended emission. These results strongly suggest that SDSS J1536+0441 is a pair of quasars, separated by 5.3 kiloparsecs, which is consistent with the recent independent finding of two compact radio sources by Wrobel and Laor.

So, is this the first double quasar ever discovered? Unfortunately, no. They are rare but there have been several discovered before. That doesn't make this story any less remarkable for me. I hope you found it interesting.

Arto Oksanen- Finnish Amateur Astronomer Extrordinaire

Arto Oksanen is a Finnish amateur astronomer interested in observing transient objects like gamma-ray burst afterglows, supernovae, novae and cataclysmic variables. He also observes exoplanet transits, and was the first amateur to observe the transit of HD 209458b.

In 2004, Oksanen received the AAVSO Directors Award for his work in variable star research. In October 2007, Oksanen was the first to find optical afterglow of GRB 071010B, which had been detected by the Swift satellite only 17 minutes earlier.

He has also discovered two minor planets (22978 Nyrola and 103422 Laurisiren).

Arto Oksanen is an Internet technology consultant by profession. He lives in Muurame, Finland with his wife Minna and their son Atte.

Recently, Arto has been observing a very interesting eclipsing polar (a highly magnetic cataclysmic variable). We had a chance to talk about just what it is that is so interesting about this star and what his observations may contribute to the knowledge of this system and magnetic CVs in general.

Mike: Hi, Arto. In recent weeks you have been following the very interesting eclipsing polar CSS 081231:071126+440405. How many eclipse timings over how many nights have you now amassed?

Arto: Yes, I have been following it practically every clear night since the outburst, or brightening, was discovered by the Catalina Real-time Transient Survey on the last day of 2008. Since that I have observed a total of 48 eclipses during 19 nights.

Mike: What telescope or telescopes are you using to obtain the data?

Arto: Mostly the 40 cm RCOS telescope of Hankasalmi observatory. It is a very nice telescope on Paramount ME and with a SBIG STL-1001E CCD. Luckily I have got enough observing time for this project. I used the 40 cm Meade LX200 of the Nyrölä observatory for one night, observing simultaneously with the Hankasalmi telescope. Both telescopes are owned by the local astronomy club. I am the president so that helps a bit.

Mike: Are you manning the telescopes in real time, observing remotely or scripting the runs and then going to bed?

Arto: For the Hankasalmi telescope I have been observing remotely. Basically starting the same script every night and the observatory automation has taken care of observing and parking the telescope and closing the dome the following morning. Photometry is also performed remotely, by a self-written script, and the result is written in the new AAVSO format that can be uploaded by a few clicks. Observing the same object night after night is very effortless. At Nyrölä the dome is manual, so the observer has to stay there to keep the dome slit aligned with the telescope.

Mike: Can you give us an update? Is the outburst over, have you been clouded out, or are you still collecting data?

Arto: I had to stop observing at the beginning of May. Our skies got too bright for observing then. The outburst seems to continue so, I hope other observers with more southern locations will follow it. OT_J0711+44 will be in conjunction in July so the observing season is soon over for everyone, but hopefully it will remain active for fall when it will be on the morning sky.

Mike: From your location in Finland, how many hours of darkness do you get this time of year? When do you lose nighttime completely, and when does it return for you?

Arto: At this time of year (mid May) we here at 62N latitude don't get any dark hours, just a short twilight that allows us to observe bright targets on southern half of the sky. The observing season starts again in the beginning of August or so.

Mike: Are you collaborating with other astronomers to do a paper on this star? If so, who?

Arto: Yes, there has been lots of interest by professional astronomers. I am collaborating with three astronomers: Pasi Hakala from Finland, Boris Gänsicke from England and Ivan Andronov from Ukraine. Each of them is preparing a paper of this star.

Mike: Can you explain how the light curve gives clues to the geometry of this system?

Arto: OK, I will try. It is obvious that this is an eclipsing system so there are two stars and that the orbit is aligned so that the stars eclipse each other. The eclipse is very deep and very fast so the eclipsed body is much brighter and very small in size. It was found very soon that the system is a polar variable, a cataclysmic variable with a very magnetic white dwarf. The strong magnetic field does not allow the accretion disk to form but directs the accretion stream to the magnetic poles of the white dwarf. The eclipse ingress and egress are extremely fast, too fast to resolve even with 5 second exposures so the light emitting region on the white dwarf is very tiny.


Mike: What do you think is happening to the accretion stream as the outburst evolves?

Arto: The stream is like a light switch to the system: when the stream is on the system is bright (high state) and when the stream is off the system is several magnitudes fainter (low state). The star seems to be around mag 18 in low state and mag 15 on high state. The light curve shows a curious dip just before the main eclipse. This is caused by the accretion stream that eclipses the white dwarf. The pre-eclipse dip varies a lot from eclipse to eclipse and is not visible at all when the system is in low state. The bright stream shows itself also on the main eclipses as the eclipse bottom is not flat but fades two more magnitudes after the sudden 2 mag drop during the 7 minute eclipse . I think the accretion is still increasing, the pre-eclipse dips are getting deeper and wider.

Mike: What new science do you think may come from exploring the characteristics of this outburst?

Arto: Probably the most interesting feature is the pre-eclipse dips that gives the (first ever?) opportunity to directly probe the accretion stream. But it needs more observations to model the system properly and making sure of the geometry. The new science is of the accretion stream for sure and probably some more knowledge of the polars as there are not too many eclipsing systems out there.

Mike: Are there any new ideas or conclusions you can share with us, or do we have to wait for the paper?

Arto: From my observations the orbital period is 117 min 10.9 sec and the main eclipse lasts 7 min 15 sec. The eclipse is 4 magnitudes deep. The ingress and egress are shorter than 5 seconds. The eclipse bottom is V (or semi V?) shaped when the star is in high state and flat bottomed in low state. The pre-dip varies a lot from eclipse to eclipse and is visible only when the system is in high state. More detailed analysis will be on the upcoming papers.

Mike: What other objects are you observing right now?

Arto: During this spring I concentrated this star, but managed to observe some other cataclysmic variables (AM CVn, QZ Vir, CP Dra, a blazar (0716+714), a few Gamma-ray bursts and confirmed a supernova.

Mike: Thanks again for taking the time to share with us.

Arto: You’re welcome; it was a pleasure.

Carnival of Space #102

This week's Carnival of Space (the 102nd edition) is hosted by one of my favorite astronomy bloggers Carolyn Collins Petersen at The Spacewriter's Ramblings blog.



This edition has been divided into chapters, or acts. 1- Solar System, 2- Stellar Follies, 3- A Brief Galaxy Diversion, 4- Future Humans, Exploring the Universe, and Examining Cosmic Mysteries and 5- Education, Amateur outreach and Politics.

Check it out!

Breaking the Routine

You know the weather has been poor if I'm showing pictures of the moon on my blog instead of light curves or pictures of exploding cataclysmic variables.

These were taken through high clouds on May 4th while I was cooling the CCD in preparation for a night of time series data on active CVs. It never did clear up enough to do photometry, but the moon is so bright you can see it through clouds with a 12 inch telescope.

Prominent in the center of this image is the crater Plato. The floor of the crater has filled up with lava, obscuring the central peak and blotting out any old craterlets. The floor is smooth and dark and doesn't have many new small craters inside.

The crater is roughly 1km deep and 109km across. Plato has been rumored to exhibit transient lunar phenomena in the past. Nothing unusual shows up in this image. Still, it is a prominent crater in a highly visible spot. If I had to name favorites Plato would be on my list of top 5 craters.

Another famous major crater on the moon is Copernicus. Unlike Plato, Copernicus has not been filled in by lava. It is 3km deep and 93km across. It has three central peaks, towering up to 1.2 km over the rough floor of the crater.

One of the more prominent features is the massive ray system emanating from the crater. They are particularly noticeable during full moon. They extend out 800 kilometers from the crater, crossing older craters and surrounding plains.




To the left is one of the more photogenic regions of the moon. The three large craters to the upper left from top to bottom are- Ptolemaeus, Alphonsus and Arzachet. Down and to the left of this trio is the large flat Mare Nubium.

Below and lower right of Mare Nubium is a crater filled region. The two largest craters in this image are Deslanders and Walter. Deslanders is 256km across, but its depth is not well known.







This last image is of the south polar highlands region. The large crater impeding into the shadows is Maginus. Maginus is an old crater and has several good sized impact craters inside its walls.

Tycho is the crater with the well-defined central peak in these last two images. Tycho is almost 5km deep and 85km across. The asteroid that created this impact crater shot ejecta up to 1,500km across the moon's surface.

Simulation studies give a 70 percent probability that Tycho was created by a fragment from the same break-up that created asteroid 298 Baptistina. A larger asteroid from the same family may have been the impactor responsible for creating Chicxulub Crater on Earth 65 million years ago, and causing the extinction of the dinosaurs.

The Remarkable Bobbie Vaile

Once in a while something comes across my desktop that piques my curiosity and causes me to look a little deeper. Often, when I take the time to dig, I find gold at the end of the rainbow that makes me glad I did the research.

Yesterday I received an electronic telegram from the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams that mentioned a new discovery about a named minor planet. The minor planet's name is (6708) Bobbievaile. After reading the news about Bobbievaile I thought I'd Google Bobbie Vaile to find out just who he was and what he did that was so remarkable they named the 6708th asteroid discovered after him.

Secretly, one of my wishes is to have an asteroid named after me one day. I have several friends and colleagues who have been honored this way, Arne Henden, Janet Mattei, Albert Jones, John Bortle, Hazel McGee, Gary Billings, Bill Dillon, Reinder Bouma, George Comello, Tom Cragg, Rick Huziak, John Percy, Brian Skiff, Ron Zissell to name a few. It would be nice to be immortalized this way, but Bobbie Vaile's story and contributions have raised the bar for inclusion in this exclusive club.

So what did Bobbie Vaile do? Well, first off, he is a she. Dr. Roberta Anne 'Bobbie' Vaile. She was an Australian astrophysicist and senior lecturer in physics on the faculty of the University of Western Sydney, Macarthur. She was also involved with Project Phoenix, a SETI experiment, and influential in establishing the SETI Australia Centre, created in 1995.

Dr. Bobbie Vaile has been described as "a computer-packing scientific evangelist who was convinced that even physics can be fun." In 1995 she was awarded the Unsung Hero of Australian Science Award in recognition of her enthusiastic and often unconventional efforts to make "hard" science easy.

Science communication was also a passion for Bobbie and she impressed everyone with her communication skills in print, radio and television.

Her work is particularly remarkable because, in 1989, at the age of 31, Dr. Vaile learned she had an inoperable brain tumor that affected the communications center of her brain. Bobbie Vaile finally succumbed to cancer in 1996, after a seven year battle.

Minor planet 6708, discovered in 1989 at the Siding Spring Observatory in New South Wales was named Bobbievaile in her honor. The citation reads: "To many colleagues and students Bobbie was a uniquely understanding and close friend, and she remains an inspiration."

As it turns out, the asteroid named for her is also quite remarkable. Yesterday a group of astronomers announced results from photometry taken on Bobbievaile from April 16 to May 3 this year. Their observations reveal that Bobbievaile is in fact a binary asteroid with a period of 24.7 hours. The primary, the largest of the two components, has a rotational period of 8.2 hours. From the lightcurve of the primary, which only has an amplitude of 0.08 magnitudes, they are pretty sure the primary is roughly spherical in shape.

They were also able to observe mutual eclipses and occulations which has helped to determine the ratio of the mean diameters of the two space rocks. They find the primary is roughly twice the size of the secondary. This they were able to determine by timing eclipses with depths 0.31 magnitudes.

A pretty remarkable asteroid named after a very remarkable woman.

Variable Stars and the Stories They Tell

The AAVSO podcast is featured on 365 Days of Astronomy again this month.

Today we look at the many reasons variable stars are so interesting to astronomers and the impact variable star research has had on astronomy.

Stellar Evolution
The study of variable stars permeates all branches of astronomy, but first and foremost, the study of variable stars is all about the secret life of stars. How they are born, the way they live and interact with the space around them, how they evolve throughout their lifetime, and ultimately, how they die.

So, what are stars and how are they formed?
A star is a massive object, typically comprised of mostly Hydrogen gas. In the beginning, a star condenses from a cloud of interstellar gases. This cloud gets perturbed enough by some external force that slightly denser pockets of material begin to form within it. Gravity causes these pockets to contract and as their rotation speeds up, causing in-falling material to form a disk we call an accretion disk. Eventually, there is a massive protostar at the center of this rotating cloud surrounded by a lumpy disk that will either be blown away by the star’s wind or become planets.

This protostar continues to grow, and after perhaps 100,000 years or so it is massive enough for nuclear fusion to ignite in its core. From this point on, the life story of our star is the perpetual balancing act between the force of gravity’s contraction and nuclear burning’s expansion trying to blow the star apart.

T Tauri stars are pre-main sequence stars that have recently emerged from this opaque envelope of stellar formation. Our own Sun presumably passed through this T Tauri stage some 4 1/2 billion years ago. Therefore, these stars offer us a peak into the early history of our own Sun and solar system, as well as other planetary systems.

Fortunately for us, most stars live out the majority of their lives peacefully converting hydrogen to helium for billions of years without any major fluctuations or changes. But as stars age and have converted more and more of their original mass from hydrogen into helium, changes begin to take place internally that change the size, temperature and behavior of the star.

As they approach middle age, many stars begin to swell as a reaction to their changing internal structure. A star like our Sun will increase its diameter by a hundred times or more, becoming what we call a red giant. Many of these red giant stars are variable stars, changing in brightness more or less regularly as their atmospheres expand and then contract on timescales of months or years. We’ve learned a lot about star’s internal workings, their atmospheres and stellar winds by studying pulsating red giants.

The stellar aging process also creates some of the most intriguing and beautiful celestial objects. Planetary nebulae are formed when a red giant star ejects its outer layers as clouds of luminescent gas. The Ring Nebula in Lyra and the Cat’s Eye Nebula in Draco are examples of the death throes of swollen, giant stars.

Even this phase is just a fleeting moment in the star’s history. In the end, the nebula will dissipate, and all that is left of our once proud star is a tiny, dense, hot white dwarf, the remnant of the core of our old, evolved star. 95% of all stars that we see in our own galaxy will ultimately become a white dwarf. That includes our Sun.

Not all stars expire so gracefully. Some super-massive stars die in violent explosions we call supernovae. These catastrophic explosions destroy the star and the energy released in the blast can outshine the entire galaxy the star resides in for weeks on end. The famous variable star Eta Carinae may be destroyed one day in exactly this manner.

One of the bi-products of all these dying stars is the heavier elements in the universe that make up our planet, the oceans, the atmosphere we breathe and the very stuff we are made of. All the heavy elements in the universe were created inside the bowels of stars that have long since blown up or blown off their atmospheres. We are indeed “stardust”, and we owe our very existence to variable stars.

Properties of Stars- Distance
Variable stars also reveal a lot about stars in other ways. Take distance, for example.

Astronomy is all about the distance to things in the universe. Variable stars are inextricably woven into the story of our determining the distances to stars and other galaxies.

For many years, the best tool in the astronomical tool bag was the Cepheid period-luminosity relationship. Cepheids are very bright, massive variables with periods of 1 -70 days. The longer the period of the Cepheid, the more luminous it is. Once we know the period of the variable, we know how bright it really is, its absolute magnitude. When we measure a star’s apparent magnitude, how bright it looks to us from a great distance, and compare it to its absolute magnitude, we can calculate the actual distance to the star mathematically. This allows Cepheids to be used as ‘standard candles’ for distance determination. Edwin Hubble used Cepheids in the Andromeda galaxy to make the first estimate of its distance, which led to the realization that it was another galaxy in its own right, hundreds of millions of light years away, and not just a nebula in our own galaxy.

Supernovae are used in much the same way today, to measure the distances to galaxies billions of light years from us.

Mass
Mass is the most important quantity of a star. A star’s initial mass largely determines its life cycle. Large, hot stars use up their fuel quickly and may only live for millions of years. Small miserly red dwarfs burn up their resources slowly, and may last for tens of billions of years.

But how do you weigh a star?
Binary stars are of great importance to astronomers because they provide the only means of directly determining the masses of stars other than our Sun. To find the mass of a binary system we need to apply Kepler's Laws. One of the important pieces of information we need to obtain to do this is the period of the stars orbiting each other. Fortunately, eclipsing binaries, another type of variable star, reveal the orbital period of systems by dimming periodically as one star passes in front of the other. Using this information can yield the total mass of the system and from there we can determine the masses of the individual components of the binary.

Nowadays we are using this same method to study planets around other stars. By measuring the minute dip in light output from a star as a planet passes in front of it from our point of view, and then figuring out the orbital period of the planet by observing multiple eclipses, we can determine the size, density, mass and other characteristics of these extra-terrestrial planets.

Binary star evolution can take some pretty wild turns off the normal evolutionary path of single stars. This is another important branch of astronomical research, and nearly all the players in this game are exotic variable stars of one type or another. The evolution of one member of a pair may have dramatic consequences for its partner over the lifetimes of these systems, as they exchange mass and evolve from one type of pair into another over time.

Large Scale Phenomena
Variable stars can also give us a better understanding of larger scale phenomena in the universe. For example, accretion disks in cataclysmic variables teach us things that can aid in our understanding of star formation, planet formation, galaxy formation, active galactic nuclei and the environments close to super-massive black holes in the hearts of distant galaxies. Because these variable star disks are so much closer and brighter than the disk around a distant black hole, they are easier to study and model.

Variable stars are everywhere. They are spread throughout our galaxy, they reside in other galaxies and they are interwoven into the history of our understanding of the Restless Universe we live in.

To find all the episodes of Restless Universe click on the logo below and you will be magically transported to the Restless Universe page on the AAVSO site.

Spica...the rest of the story

Spica, also known as Alpha Virginis, is the brightest star in the constellation Virgo. Because it lies on the ecliptic, the path of the Sun, Moon and planets across the sky, it is sometimes occulted (eclipsed) by the Moon.

Other than on those occasions, to the unaided eye Spica shines constantly at magnitude o.98, making it the 16th brightest star in the sky. But like so many other stars you wouldn't suspect are actually variable stars, Spica is much more than meets the eye.

As a side note, five of the top sixteen brightest stars are variable stars. They are Betelgeuse, Hadar, Aldebaran, Antares and Spica.

Spica is an interesting case, because not only does it pulsate, causing it to fluctuate in brightness, but it is part of an exotic pair of stars doing a cosmic dance in very close proximity to each other.

Spica is an ellipsoidal variable. Ellipsoidal variables are binary systems where the two components are close enough to distort their shapes into elongated, egg-shaped stars. As they rotate around each other they show us varying amounts of combined surface area. When we see them both from the side we see the maximum amount of surface area. Since brightness is directly related to the amount of surface area throwing light our way we see the pair at its brightest when we see them both from the side. When they rotate around to the point we are looking at them from the end of one or the other star, we see the least amount of surface area shining at us, so the star appears slightly dimmer.

The time it takes to go from bright to faint and then back to maximum light can be measured, and this in turn tells us the period of rotation of the system. In Spica's case, that's about four days. Keep in mind though, these variations are not really detectable without using photoelectric photometry or a CCD. Spica varies from 0.92 - 1.04 magnitudes, too small a change to record visually.

This might seem like a small, insignificant thing to note or study, but consider these facts. The primary component of the pair is 11 times more massive and 8 times the radius of our Sun. Its smaller partner is 7 times as massive as our sun and 4 times as big. These two massive stars spin around a common center of mass so quickly that it only takes 96 hours to complete a cycle. Their combined light output is on the order of 15,000 times the luminosity of our Sun. Its a good thing Spica is a comfortable 260 light years away, or there would be no night time on earth.



Not only does Spica have all this craziness going on, but due to instabilities in its interior, the primary has reached a point in its evolution where it is now pulsating. Yes, its atmosphere is actually expanding and contracting periodically. Beta Cepheids (not to be confused with the better known Delta Cepheids) have periods of 2 -12 hours or so. Maximum light occurs when the star is contracted down to its smallest hottest state, and minimum corresponds to its expanded cooler phase. This variation is also quite small, a few hundredths of a magnitude.

So to the unaided eye Spica shines fairly constantly and only winks at us when the Moon passes in front of it once in a while during an occultation. But to those in the know, Spica is an active constantly changing system, containing two massive stars whipping around each other in space, distorting their shapes into eggs while one of them throws its whole atmosphere up and down in a matter of hours.

As Paul Harvey would have said, "and that my friends, is the rest of the story."